01
Source hierarchy
We prefer primary sources, official documentation, company disclosures and first-party datasets. Reputable secondary reporting is used when primary material is unavailable or when independent context is needed.
GAEO.ai uses AI as a research and production tool, but public claims still need clear provenance, review and context.
01
We prefer primary sources, official documentation, company disclosures and first-party datasets. Reputable secondary reporting is used when primary material is unavailable or when independent context is needed.
02
Material claims should be traceable to a source, dataset, documented operating record or clearly labelled analysis. Estimates, interpretation and opinion are kept separate from verified facts.
03
AI may support discovery, extraction, comparison, drafting and quality checks. It does not replace source review for important factual claims. Public content is reviewed before publication.
04
Dates reflect the actual publication or review cycle. Pages are not marked as updated simply because the site was rebuilt or redeployed.
05
When a material error is identified, we correct the page and update the review date when appropriate.
06
Product pages explain what is available now. Concepts, pilots and future directions should not be presented as shipped capabilities.
Evidence labels
Across the site we distinguish public evidence, company disclosures, documented career records, platform records and author analysis. The label tells readers what kind of support sits behind a claim.